Minnesota  Children's Environmental Health Profile


Did you know 48% of Minnesota's children live in counties that do not monitor ozone pollution levels?  Or that while the national average temperature increase since 1970 is 2.8 degrees F, Minnesota's temperature increase is 3.3 degrees F? All children deserve a safe and healthy environment to grow and develop. This profile highlights key Minnesota children's environmental health indicators, federal support received by the state for environmental health, health equity, and climate and health programs, and a spotlight feature on a children's environmental health-related topical issue.

Continue reading to learn more about environmental hazards, children's exposures, and children's health outcomes in Minnesota, or click the blue button to download the profile as a PDF.

Key Children's Environmental Health Indicators for Minnesota

What is a Children's Environmental Health Indicator?

See Indicator References

Safe Drinking Water: 3% of public water utilities had drinking water violations (2020). National average: 31%
Air Quality: 48% of children under age 18 live in the 72 (out of 87 total) counties that do not monitor ozone pollution (2021).
Warming Temperatures: 3.3 degrees F warmer in 2020 than in 1970: National average 2.8 degrees F warmer
Toxic Chemical Releases: 20.4 million pounds of toxic chemicals were disposed of or released (2020). United States 3.1 billion pounds
Neurodevelopmental Disorders: 6.8% of children age 3-17 have ADD or ADHD (2019-2020). Nationwide: 8.9%. 2.7% of children age 3-17  have Autism Spectrum Disorder (2019- 2020) Nationwide: 2.9%
Asthma: 7% of children under age 18 have asthma (2018- 2019) Nationwide: 7.7%
Pediatric Cancer: 185.7 cases of pediatric cancer per 1 million population (2005-2015) Nationwide: 181.0 cases per 1 million
Blood lead levels: 1.4% of tested children under age 6 have elevated blood lead levels (2018) Nationwide: 2.6%
Poverty: There are 1.3 million children in Minnesota, and approximately 11% of them live in poverty

Minnesota Spotlight: Minnesota Department of Health Drinking Water Guidance

Minnesota is one of only a few states that develops its own drinking water guidance in addition to existing EPA standards. State law specifies that the guidance must adequately protect the health of infants and children. To this end, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has developed drinking water guidance that considers developmental “windows of sensitivity” to toxicants as well as periods of high exposure.

The state is particularly aggressive in its monitoring of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of persistent chemicals that pose significant health risks. MDH toxicologists uniquely consider placental transfer and transfer through formula-feeding and breastmilk in their risk assessment of PFAS in water sources.

MDH has a long-term goal of sampling all community water systems in the state for PFAS. Under this goal, MDH aims to cover 90% of CWS customers under its PFAS monitoring program by 2025. They will also sample noncommunity water systems in areas that are most vulnerable to PFAS contamination to address the highest potential public health risks.

Federal Support to Minnesota within the past 5 years (click to expand):

CDC-Funded Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
ATSDR State Cooperative Agreement Program
CDC National Asthma Control Program
CDC-funded Environmental Public Health Tracking Program
CDC State Biomonitoring Cooperative Agreement Program

Children's Environmental Health Indicators Selection Criteria (click to expand):


Children's environmental health indicators (CEHIs) are measures that can be used to assess environmental hazards, exposures, and their resulting health outcomes in children.  The below criteria are used when determining which indicators to utilize:
    • Relevance: Each headline indicator should be a clear, understandable indicator of children’s environmental health, with broad relevance for a range of audiences at the state level – with relevance to the national level.
    • Representativeness: The indicators as a package should provide a representative picture of children’s health and relation to the environment.
    • Traceability: Each indicator should be calculated using an agreed-upon (and published) method and accessible and verifiable data.
    • Timeliness: Each indicator should be calculated regularly (at least biennially), with a short lag between the end of the period and publication of the data.
    • Data adequacy: The available data needed for the indicator must be sufficiently robust, reliable and valid.
    • Universality: Indicators must be comparable across all or very nearly all 50 U.S. states.

Indicator Notes and References (click to expand):



Air Quality


Warming Temperature


Toxic Chemicals
  • Indicator Note: EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) tracks the management of certain toxic chemicals that may pose a threat to human health and the environment. Certain industrial facilities in the U.S. must report annually how much of each chemical is disposed of or released on and off site. Many of these chemicals are known carcinogens, developmental toxicants, and neurotoxicants, such as arsenic, lead and mercury, that adversely impact children's health.
  • Reference: Summary of 509 Toxic Release Inventory Facilities in Minnesota. Reporting Year 2020.


Neurodevelopmental Disorders


Asthma


Pediatric Cancer


Blood Lead Levels
  • Indicator Note: In 2017, 21.9% of Minnesota children under age 6 were tested for blood lead levels (BLLs). Of those tested, 0.6% had a BLL>= 5 µg/dL. Often the most vulnerable children are not tested, and not all who are tested get reported, so 0.6% is likely an underestimate of the true scope of children's elevated blood lead in Minnesota. There is no safe level of lead exposure for children. A potent neurotoxicant, lead reduces IQ and impairs other cognitive, behavioral and developmental functions. In 2021, the CDC lowered the BLL reference value from 5 to 3.5 µg/dL.
  • Reference: National Childhood Blood Lead Surveillance Data. Minnesota (2018). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.




Minnesota Spotlight


All children deserve and need a safe and healthy environment to grow and develop. They need clean air to breathe, safe water to drink, nutritious food to eat, and healthy places in which to live, learn, and play. Early exposure to harmful agents can lead to acute and chronic adverse outcomes. Infants and children are especially vulnerable to environmental exposures because they breathe, eat and drink more, in proportion to their body size, than do adults, and because their bodies and brains are still developing.

A blueprint for Protecting Children's Environmental Health Network set out to identify a set of CEHIs that can be used to provide an understanding of children's environmental health at the state level. Through this process, CEHN found that robust, valid, and regularly updated state level data--that are comparable across most states--were not readily accessible. States need adequate funding and capacity to collect and make accessible reliable CEHI data in order to set goals and track progress towards improving children's health.

Children are our future - society has a moral obligation to protect them. Exposure to environmental hazards can and must be prevented. Prevention requires strong environmental regulations, fully funded and supportive public and environmental health programs and a robust workforce.

Jump to Another State (click to expand):